The most forgettable and confusingly titled chapter of Vin Diesel’s magnum opus (or of anything else, for that matter), the series’ fourth film takes such a hardboiled, back-to-basics approach that it effectively functions like a soft reboot. Regrettably, Michael Mann has not directed a “Fast and Furious” movie. If Michael Mann had directed a “Fast and Furious” movie, it would have been this one. Still, this boring and benign chapter is rightly remembered more for its all-time stupid title than anything else, and it taught the world a very valuable lesson: A “Fast and Furious” movie without Vin Diesel is isn’t really a “Fast and Furious” movie. In fact, John Singleton’s benign, goofy sequel (how goofy? Cole Hauser is the main bad guy, and the movie ends with the destruction of a precious yacht) is responsible for adding a few franchise cornerstones, as it introduces Roman and Tej into the mythology and gives them both enough background to coast through their long futures as comedic relief. In truth, the saga’s first sequel is probably not as fun as the one that’s currently in theaters (though mileage may vary), but “2 Fast 2 Furious” gets the edge over “The Fate of the Furious” because - dumb as it is - it isn’t damaging to the series as a whole. READ MORE: IndieWire’s Full Review Of ‘The Fate Of The Furious’ 7. It’s nice that Paul Walker gets to live on through these movies - his unseen character is still chilling on a beach somewhere - but the actor’s death has eliminated the last remaining failsafes that were preventing this franchise from forgetting what it’s all about, and “F8” sends the entire enterprise careening towards a full-blown identity crisis. manage to learn all of the wrong lessons from the last two movies, delivering an episode where everything feels so fake that even the “family” matters seem forced? Gary Gray, whose surprisingly strong remake of “The Italian Job” displayed a tremendous flair for comedic vehicular mayhem, waste the biggest budget of his career on such boring smash-ups? How does Charlize Theron (Furiosa!) sink this into a half-assed story of cyber-terrorism? How did Diesel and co. “The Fate of the Furious” is the “Die Another Day” of its franchise - an empty, generic shell of its former self that disrespects its own proud heritage at every turn. 'White Noise': All the Details on Noah Baumbach's Film Starring Adam Driver and Greta Gerwig Oscars 2023: Best Animated Feature Predictions Rita Moreno Joins 'Fast X' Cast to Play Vin Diesel's Grandmother Dom loves Letty, the people of the Dominican Republic, and stealing gas from the rich to give to the poor.Michelle Rodriguez Gained '10 Pounds of Muscle' for 'Dungeons & Dragons' Role, Enjoyed 'Chiseling Out' Her Body A quick line of dialogue establishes that the Han we see in "Los Bandoleros" has never been to Japan, so we know that the short film takes place before "Tokyo Drift," which is set in Tokyo (naturally). Han originally appeared (and died) in 2006's "The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift," which was the third movie released, though it doesn't take place until later in the timeline. " Letty's technically not the only familiar face in the short film, though. Dom's new crew includes Han (Sung Kang), Tego (Tego Calderon), Santos (Don Omar), and a familiar face in Letty (Michelle Rodriguez), Dom's childhood friend and main squeeze.ĭom and Letty rekindle their romance just in time for the upcoming heist, which definitely won't affect the plot of "Fast & Furious. The target? A gasoline tanker truck (Dom presumably never learned not to mess with truckers after his adventures in "The Fast and the Furious"). That question is answered in 2009's "Los Bandoleros," a short film co-written and directed by Vin Diesel that serves as a prelude to the series' fourth feature film, "Fast & Furious." The short follows Dom as he assembles a new crew for an upcoming heist in the Dominican Republic.
0 Comments
I've repeated the compressed-air-and-cotton-bud cleaning a couple of times, but this is as good as it's going to get I think - and on anything except the blackest of black areas the lines are now unnoticeable. it's almost perfect, with only the faintest of lines still visible. However, looking at the results now, using the same black paper as on the original tests. Running one of those on the underneath of the ADF glass didn't seem to dislodge anything obvious. Fortunately I have a few extra-long and narrow swabs handy. The gap in the housing wasn't big enough to get any kind of cleaning cloth in, and regular cotton buds (Q-Tips) were too short and too thick to reach the glass. A test of the flatbed scan was much better, but the ADF scan was still as noisy as ever - there still seemed to be some kind of dust or dirt on the underneath of the scanning glass used by the ADF. I blew some compressed air in (full disclosure: I actually used a kiddie's paddling pool inflation pump), which resulted in a pleasing amount of dust being blown back at me. By prising those up and jamming a couple of screwdriver bits underneath, I was able to separate the glass from the mechanism just enough to create a gap of maybe a couple of millimetres. The scanner unit itself is almost a separate component, but I couldn't find how to access the screws holding it in place however, there are three plastic clips holding the top half (the glass) to the bottom half (the assembly containing the scanner mechanics). By removing a few screws, I could remove the left-hand side panel of the printer, giving me access to the underneath of the scanner mechanism. I've managed to (almost) solve the problem for myself. Does anyone have any advice on how to resolve or work around the issue - is there any software that will "clean up" these lines automagically? I don't want to replace what is otherwise a perfectly good device just for this relatively trivial problem unfortunately, the issue is starting to become noticeable in my scanned material. Also, the lines on the ADF scan don't correspond to the lines on the flatbed scan - if the problem was dust on the scanhead, wouldn't the lines appear in the same place on both scans? There's no obvious way to tear down the device to get to the underneath of the scanning glass to give that a clean. I've thoroughly cleaned the scanner glass, both the main flatbed and the smaller ADF section, and I've inspected it carefully using a flashlight for any signs of dust or specks of paper - there aren't any, and certainly none the correspond to the position of the vertical lines. The lines appear much worse on the ADF scan. As an example, here's a blank sheet of black poster paper scanned in via the ADF:Īnd here's the same page scanned via the flatbed: However, recently my scanned documents have started to suffer from vertical lines appearing. My HP OfficeJet Pro 8620 has served me well, both as a printer and a document scanner. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |